Better plumbing at No. 10

26072008959The backlash against the new site from the Prime Minister’s Office has begun. Neil McIntosh just popped up in my feed reader tearing it apart for limiting conversation and some poor planning/research around the branding of the video channel. And then Tosh minor chimes in on twitter: “@DowningStreet – turn on your comments”

In my view, what’s happening here is that we’ve got some better plumbing installed, and while that in itself does a little to raise the quality of the drinking water, there’s so much more to be done and part of that is recognising that plumbing isn’t just about delivering water, it’s about providing a circulatory system to support and enhance something that’s going on already.

I’m not certain that just turning the comments on is the way to go, immediately. Of course it would be great to open up the conversation online but I do think the whole thing is still too fragile to withstand the shenanigans of people like this.

The work now should be to build some more solid two-way relationships between No. 10, online journalists and bloggers. My first question would be why press people like Neil haven’t been more intimately involved in the project already. Many people are still impressed when the guys on the @downingstreet twitter feed reply directly to questions and comments. When Obama was here and I was hanging around outside, I had a significantly different experience simply because we had a feed coming from inside and questions were answered in real time. Yes, our government departments are too opaque, but from where I’m sitting, I see much greater will to move towards real transparency than we’ve had in the past. This is a small enabling step towards it – let’s support it rather than knock it down straight away.

About these ads

5 thoughts on “Better plumbing at No. 10”

  1. Beautifully put, Lloyd.

    I think a lot of people are missing the point that it’s using WordPress as a lightweight, extensible CMS, as opposed to ‘turning the site into a blog’. Objective one was to get the site on to a more modern, more agile, non-locked-in platform. Objective met.

    Neil’s welcome to criticise the visuals; and some have picked up on validation issues. But the very fact that we’re on an open platform like WordPress now means it’s easy for people to come in with specific skills – technical, creative, whatever – and make it better.

  2. Thanks Simon, I appreciate the difficulty of getting something simple done in any politically complex environment. Transparency and regular updates on bug resolution and around progress on the “softer” side will really help.

  3. The point isn’t that they are “using WordPress”, the point is that they have done a half-arsed job. The site is a national embarrassment.

Comments are closed.