Category Archives: words

Wednesday, 24th September 2025

First morning with the heating on (min temperatures overnight are around 7 or 8ºC).  It feels like magic.  I think it's the memory of when we first moved to a house with central heating (on November 5th 1975).  It felt like real luxury, not to wake up under blankets in a cold room, having to make the dash downstairs to the fire, but to be able to get out of bed and just walk around in your pyjamas.


I'm running again.  C25K W5R2 IYKYK.


Laura and I started a practice 5 years ago this week of telling each other 3 things that we're grateful for when we sit down to dinner – most days it's a good break for both of us from days of striving to achieve.  I think it also kind of marks when we started having dinner together more often than not, before that we'd just see to ourselves, but particularly because pandemic, it became easier for me to just cook for both of us.   We were in Aberdyfi and it was six months since lockdown had started, our first proper trip away from the South East in that time.  

I miss the West of this island.  My old school pal James is posting pics of Harlech and Portmeirion and it reminds me that even though we had a few days in Frinton, it's not the same – I want to see the sun setting (not rising) over the sea.  It's one of the regrets I have about not driving and not having a car – I have a fantasy that if I did, then I'd find it easier to just jump on the M4 and head over to the land of my fathers.


Thursday, 18th September 2025

In bizarrely synchronistic news, I was reminded last night of the Librivox project, my first (and only) contribution to which, I published here twenty years ago tomorrow

I came across it again because I was looking up Thoreau’s essay on Civil Disobedience (for, y’know, contemporary culture reasons). And the Wikipedia page references recordings on Librivox

I believe the Secret Agent project (and Librivox as a whole) was inspired by the AKMA-initiated collaborative reading of Lessig’s Free Culture – which happened in April 2004 just as conversations about podcasting were getting going.

At the time I recorded a chapter, podcasting was in full swing – we even had a conference here! I had achieved what little notoriety I ever would for making podcasts out of me talking to myself while walking around in London. I remember walking up and down the backstreets of Westminster trying to find a suitable location that was close enough to Scotland Yard to feel like it had some local colour. But it was too wet and windy even for my low production standards!

Speaking of production standards, there’s a very samizdat feel to those collaborative recordings that I think we’ve lost touch with in our need to make polished media for each other. Something about the content (yes the actual contents of the work) being more valuable than the presentation.

Friday, 12th September 2025

I spent yesterday back at Conway Hall.  I'm trying to think of other things I've done there other than Interesting (which I helped Russell with for the first three years and which I then attended a couple of times?) There was The Story that Matt Locke did.  I feel like there must be other things but I can't remember them (or find them in any of my archives).  If I've been to or organised something else there with you, do remind me.

Anyway, yesterday was "The Fate of Britain", an Absurd Intelligence/Hard Art production.   It was a brave attempt to pull togther people who are up for alternatives to the so-called "Multifaceted Intersecting Shitshow".  I think it worked – lots of people met new people and made connections.  Some things seem to be clicking into place.  I was glad that I had no responsibility to do anything.  It let me do my quietly unassuming schtick while getting to chat gently with interesting folk, old and new.   It was a chance to get some focus on what's important to me and what sorts of things I can contribute.

It made me laugh that the Camerados' Public Living Room includes oversized underpants to put on to deflate egos somewhat.  I seem to have done something similar 18 years ago at Interesting 2007


 

Scale-wise, inbetween the everyone-in-the-hall sessions and the corridor conversations I went to something on "Building an Intergenerational Movement" convened by Charles Landry.  Interesting parts for me are the need for third spaces to practice this stuff (tempered with the need to work the tensions  with homophily and propinquity), but also that there's a lot of bollocks talked (by people of all ages, and not necessarily those in the room) about generational differences and similarities and what to do about it.  I also felt the tension between those people who seem to have been rewarded with power in our world despite (or perhaps because of) their tendency to act childishly and those people (towards the lower end of the age range) who feel they're subject to enforced infantilism by economic circumstances that make it impossible to attain some of the markers of maturity like buying a house, or having a coherent career.


I was reminded by something in a conversation with Vanessa Chamberlin at lunchtime about this place being mine and being a place to write like there's nobody reading.  Part of that is about me not needing to explain everything in the above couple of paragraphs before I hit the Publish button.  It's frustrating, but there are a bazillion things I want to write about and if I try to write in the way that I think is required for publication (writing like somebody really clever and important reading),  I end up either with a long list of bullet points or a very long and boring exploration of one thing. I hold onto the hope that writing things and not explaining everything immediately is better than not writing at all (or writing in sekrit places that nobody will ever see).


I'm a bit shit sometimes – in particular when it comes to relying on other people to tell stories about me rather than me telling them for myself (by which I mean that I think I should be better at doing it myself instead of relying on others so much…)


Wednesday, 3rd September

Today would have been my Dad’s 88th birthday (two fat ladies – 88!). He was 2 years old when WW2 started. When I was 2 (and three quarters) it was his 30th birthday and I recently found a recording of him and me “talking” on that day. If I can find it again easily (it’s digitised but not indexed!) I’ll post it. In it, he’s doing the most ridiculous (to me) BBC accent. That wasn’t how he spoke usually, except sometimes on the phone or when he knew he was being recorded. He told me once that he had auditioned to be a newsreader, but that John Edmunds had got the job. After he died, my mother told me that when she met him, he wanted three things – to have children, to play in a band and to programme computers. He did all three very well.


As we get settled into doing Living Culture Coffee Mornings regularly, I’m starting to think about ways that we can do things together that represent some sort of “capture” of the thinking and interactions between people in the room. I wrote (eighteen months ago?!?) about the kinds of problems I’ve encountered before with this and how the ‘metalabel’ platform might help. And I’m starting to see how doing that might also be a way into changing the relationship between such groups and the premises that they meet in.

One of the problems in that kind of relationship is that the rental model is dominant. If you have a space (especially in a big city like London) you’re “obliged” to make money out of people who book it for their own use. In the case of businesses who want to hire a meeting room or conference facilty, then that’s just an acceptable cost of doing business that you can either cover yourself or else you pass on to the people who come to your event. But if you have a space that you want to be available to a wide range of people and groups to do interesting and socially useful things, neither the organisers nor the participants necessarily have a great deal of cash to cover this and they aren’t usually thinking about how to generate revenue to pay for it because that’s just not the priority for these creative sorts of activities.

At early prototypes of Tuttle our hosts were (initially) happy with how much coffee we were buying and grateful for any extra that we could raise by passing the hat. But the more successful and popular we became, the more that the space owners saw an imbalance between what we werer getting from being there and what they were seeing in the cash register.

At C4CC we kind of got around that by having a long(er)-term relationship with the University and the Colleges but in the end it came to the same point from the hirer’s point of view – money goes in, but doesn’t really come out. Now in the case of a University, you’d hope that they might be used to the idea of investing in order to create value in the wider economy, but under the pressures of the London property market, the obsession with opportunity costs makes such relationships much more transactional and therefore vulnerable.

During my time at Guildford URC, we got around this by centralising all bookings in one person (fortunately not me!), supported by the trustees where necessary and having a flexible mix of standard rates and pay-what-you-can (even if that’s £0.00) while (mostly) resisting the temptation to take big sums from people who weren’t otherwise particularly aligned with the mission.

So now we’re doing coffee mornings monthly (and, I keep teasing, possibly weekly) and wondering whether there’s an opportunity to do things differently. Something to fill the gap between “you’ve got to pay for everything” (which excludes people without a business model) and “it’s all free!” (which risks being over-run with people who do have a business model, and you’re just reducing their costs) If you have a space that’s supposed to be about learning and spiritual growth and you have an event programme that reflects that, might there be a way to satisfy at least some of the need for rent *and* help build community between all of your “hirers” by also making and selling things for the mutual benefit of both the groups who make them and the space that hosts them?

See we really need better words than “hirers” and “space owners” – for this kind of thing the relationship needs to be about something other than the economic roles we’re playing.

If you’re interested in how this might work, then come along on Friday.


Oh the flags? I think the flags are just another instance of political trolling. Why are they doing it? I don’t think that the people putting up flags are reliable witnesses when it comes to asking what their motivations are. I think they believe what they’re saying, but the underlying motivation that gets erased is “to make snowflakes like you melt” – it’s the reaction to the action that feeds the whole thing. And I do think there are people who are coming at this as a way of stirring dissent. We encourage one group to do something that will really trigger another group. But I don’t think that the people putting up the flags and shouting about how it’s just patriotism are the ones that are benefiting most from all of us shouting at each other.

Now that most of our social media platforms are essentially corporatised 4chan we have to be even more vigilant about not feeding the trolls.

Tuesday, 2nd September 2025

Overheard in a medical setting:

“Have you brought a urine sample?”

“No, I couldn’t because I don’t have a wotsit”

me: eyes widening… and trying not to look at the receptionist

turns out that by “wotsit”, they meant “sample bottle”


20 years ago, podcasting felt like (and mostly *was*) a DIY movement. It was part of the fun to have to jump through all sorts of hurdles to get your stuff out there. It felt highly unlikely that more than a handful of people would ever hear it. That made the few who did hear it and who let you know that they’d heard it, feel close to you, whether they liked it or not.

Now I can put a short video on YouTube or TikTok and within a few hours see hundreds of “views” from people who I’ll never hear from again. And what I make is in some sort of weird competition with people selling products, ideas and ideologies.

All the talk in 2005 was about how to make production easier for creators and discovery easier for listeners. Discovery is still not great for longer-form content, but I can reach a lot more people than I ever could before, with way less effort.

Which just shows how meaningless “reach” can be. I’m not entirely convinced that we’re any better off now than we used to be. When a comment from someone on YouTube turns into a relationship where I end up sitting face to face with someone, grinning at the ridiculousness of it all, I might change my mind. Till then, keep on posting!


I was reminded today of the point in my life where I needed to sleep until I was ready to work and then work until I was ready to sleep. Few other calls on my time. I don’t *miss* it, but it worked for a while.


Monday, 1st September 2025

Pinch, punch, first of the month (no returns!)

I picked this up when I went to see the memorial to Nick at St Bride’s a couple of months ago. It has sat on my desk since then and this morning I thought I ought to at least try reading it properly.

I’m not going to try to convince or argue with anyone who is unable to read this because of the first and last lines. My own feeling is that I don’t think it really matters what you think the mechanics are, I do hold a wish that the will of those among us whose work it is to write what many read can be strengthened and pointed in the direction of the highest good for all. That such people (including me) might be bold in confronting evil and injustice. And that we might use our power with honesty and courage, respect and integrity so that I can face myself and my peers (and whatever might or might not come after this life).


The same unwillingness to convince or argue is a feature of the Living Culture Coffee Mornings (next one this Friday!) – they’re not for discussing angels and pinheads. Much more like whatever you do or don’t believe about how the universe works, what’s the best thing for us all to be doing that might help us get along better?


Yes, I’ve got something to say about flags. I’m not sure I’ve got it all straight in my head yet though.

What performative gestures are killing real community in your space?

Oof! This is the question that formed the basis of yesterday's "Unreasonable Connection". It's a lot more direct than I heard it in the room!

The breakout group that I was part of, talked mostly about running events and dealing with such events "not working" in some way – usually evidenced by the feeling that not enough people turn up. I believe, and said so, that there are loads of reasons why people don't come to an event at their coworking space, but that we, the community managers, (or whatever we're calling ourselves this week) usually make up that there are only two possible reasons – we chose the wrong subject or put it on at the wrong time.

My blog archive tells me that I've been failing to get people to come to things since at least March 2007 so I feel pretty expert in this!

The approach I've developed over the years has boiled down to "have no expectations" – that's what's working well (for me) at the Living Culture Coffee Mornings but also to have a theme, which distinguishes what you're doing from most other things people could be doing, while being loose enough to allow people to see themselves fitting in. That can take time and a few iterations, but it's good medicine for the "wrong subject" bit. When it comes to the "wrong time" all I have is that within the constraints of when you're open, every time is equally able to be wrong and right for everyone, so you have to choose the right time for you (with a little help from your friends) and stick to it unless and until you've been proved totally wrong.

So on occasions when I've been really focused on showing someone else that I'm actively persuading people to come along rather than accepting that "whoever comes are the right people", have I been killing real community? Does what I focus on really matter that much? I guess the thesis underneath that is that when you're doing something mostly for performative value (ie for the impression it makes on stakeholders rather than the value it adds to the network) then the network suffers.

I've been fond of saying that to add value to a network, you can either add new nodes or new connections, but also you can make existing connections richer and that enriching connections is the tricky bit. What makes interpersonal connections richer? It's not just finding out how people are the same as you, it can sometimes be finding out that people are different, or (more likely imho) how they're the same as you in some ways but different from you in some important other ways. At this point at C4CC, Brian would probably say something about homophily and propinquity and we'd all nod.

"Where am I going to put my attention when I actively build this community?", "how will I know I'm doing a good job?", "what will add value to this group of people?", "what reduces value among this group of people?" Those are questions that I prefer to dwell on.

Also, is there a "fake community" to distinguish this "real community" from? It feels to me like that's the spreadsheet version, or the "directory". It's a capture of the nodes in the network rather than the nature of the connections. And even if you manage to draw in some of the connections that you're aware of, these aren't all the connections there are, possibly by a really long way. Because there will be connections that none of the participants are aware of, that don't get revealed simply by getting people to further fill in a form about what they know, what they like or don't like, where they've worked before, what they can offer, what they need etc. And the problem is mistaking all that for the "real community", mistaking the data about the network for the messily human, complex system that it is. (extra credit for pattern matchers who ask "is there a 'dead culture' to distinguish this 'living culture' from?" – a common question in these parts)

Again, does this "kill real community"? Or is it no worse than a distraction, something that makes people (including you) feel better about the level of connection (and diversity) in the group and that it's at least kind of manageable when you've got some data and you can feel like you've done what you can. Or is it possible that the only way to get me to unpick this for myself is for Uncle Bernie to make up a provocatively-worded question? Empirically, it would seem so.

Wednesday, 20th August 2025

On Friday, it’ll be 34 years since I first became a father.  It’s the role I’ve played most consistently (if not always brilliantly) in this lifetime.  Since then that time of year that used to feel like “back to school” has felt more like “woah! wtf?! we made a person!”  

I’ve done a lot of dadding, but I still feel like a noob.  Last week we went to Frinton for a few days and Ewan joined us for a couple.  We had good conversations over the breakfasts that I made for us.  Cleared some things up, laughed at ourselves, got a bit more understanding.  Walked down to the sea and paddled together.  Like you do.  Like we do.


This is my desk this morning.  Yes it’s a mess, but it’s my mess and I love all the bits of it.


I’m finding it hard to disconnect from the rolling dopamine frenzy driven by social media algorithms. I bet nobody else ever feels like this (ha!) Even when I write here, I’m thinking, should I be putting this somewhere else? Should it be somewhere where it will get more engagement? So the work at the moment is to simply put one word after another, here in my own place, to practice detaching from who is reading or even who is just noticing that I’ve posted something – which is what I’m doing most of the time when I’m scrolling. It takes a lot for me to click through, but I think, “Oh, @friend47 has posted something, that’s nice”

That can’t be what all this typing is for. Just a mutual neurotransmitter depletion game.


I think though that I will resurrect my mastodon presence, not because I think masto is a great place to hang out, more that wordpress has good integration with it. You get to see the full text (unless it’s ridiculously long) rather than a link that you won’t click on unless I write a click-baity caption that will take as much time and effort as writing the actual post in the first place.


Dan has been appointed Writer in Residence on the Sittingbourne Steam Railway and has published his first piece.

One sentence – four links, that’s what the web gives you, my dears.


Thanks to the awesome Bernie Mitchell, I just went along to “Unreasonable Connection” billed as the “world’s smallest coworking event” – it’s a tightly-run (but relaxed) hour-long call with a bunch of people running spaces or building community or both. Interesting conversation about the things that we think we *ought* to do in a space and what actually works. I was in a break out with lovely people doing their coworking magic in London, Tunbridge Wells and Toronto. Thanks Bernie!


In the last couple of days, I’ve watched both Oppenheimer and Barbie (in that order). Over the weekend, I rewatched Stephen Poliakoff’s 1999 TV play ‘Shooting The Past’. So all in all, I’m feeling a bit emosh.

Wandering into the web

After breakfast, but before coffee, I went up the garden to see whether we have a couple of folding chairs in the kind of shed/cupboard thing that's on level 3.  

Our garden is cut into a steep hill.  If you count our downstairs as level 0 then my studio is on level 1 and it opens out onto some steps up to level 2 (which I also call the "first lawn" even though, embarrassingly, it's astroturf) then there's the "upper lawn" on level 3 which also has a plastic cupboardy thing in which I hoped there were some camping chairs.  Not totally relevant to this story, but for completeness, there's some controversy (in my mind, nobody else has ever given this any thought, ever) over whether the next two levels are 4 and 5 or 3.5 and 4.  The next one up from 3 is much shallower and just has the greenhouse on it and the base of the sturdy steps up to the decking which is the edge of our domain and where I was thinking of sitting this morning, at least for as long as the heat is bearable.  

God, I'm glad I've cleared that up, it's been bothering me for months that nobody else knows about the numbering system.  Yes, I have a wife and family and friends who have visited since we moved in, but none of them can be trusted with this kind of information the way you can.

Anyway.  The main plot point here takes place on level 2 (about which there is no controversy except whether the hyperbole of calling it the "upper lawn" is sufficiently obvious – you haven't seen it, but you can probably imagine me saying it, pompously.)

What I didn't know when I climbed the stairs from the back door to the astroturf was that there was a mahoooosive spiders web hanging between (I think) the Narnia lamp post (don't ask, we didn't put it there but we haven't got rid of it yet either) and one of the olive trees.  I think that's where it was but when I walked through it, my chatty brain kind of shut down to focus on the involuntary squawking and flapping that the rest of my body was doing.  The next thing that I thought was I hope nobody saw or heard that, while at the same time secretly hoping that everybody saw and heard me.  The second thing was poscessing that what's stuck to my glasses and my face is probably the guts of some insects that have been caught earlier and already nibbled on by the spider.  But I also kept moving and noticing more stuff in my hair and beard and then realise that my skin is super sensitive and I'm imagining that every tickle and twitch is actually some half-dead creature that I'd missed in my first round of slapping and wiping my head.  Has something gone down my t-shirt?  Did anything go up my nose?

It's only when I'm up the steps and finding that indeed we do not have any camping chairs in the cupboardy thing that I'm laughing at myself and realising how impossible it would be to recreate that scene authentically on stage or screen.  I mean I could have a go, and you'd all laugh too, but part of that laughter would be because of the tiny gap between my prowess as an actor and the reality of seeing a grown man squawking and flapping at the web that has just ensnared him.

Tuesday, 6th May 2025

I need to blog more.  I need to write more, but I also need to release more and this is the best place I have for doing that.  I caught myself giving someone feedback on their work which was really an expression of my frustration with not feeling productive myself.  It's not enough to apologise to that person, I need to change my behaviour too – and that just means typing more often into a text box.


I've got a lot of London this week.  I went to Hard Art today, I'm going to a thing in Hackney tomorrow evening and staying over because I'm opening space for a client on Thursday morning.  I'm getting used now to remembering that I don't live there.  I can't just get a bus home from the West End.  In an ideal world I'd have a club where we could stay over when needed, but I don't think I'm there yet.  I like being able to get out of town at the end of the day and walk up the hill from the station.


I've started walking early in the morning instead of running.  It's better for my hips and knees, but also easier to do every day.  A forty minute stroll around the town gets me a solid 5,000 steps before breakfast.


At Hard Art we worked with Katy Rubin on Legislative Theatre.  As someone who started out as an actor, worked in public service for ten years trying to make things better for citizens and now makes things with people, for people, out of people, it was a lovely way to pull everything together.  There was a lot to take in, but we sprinted through it with just enough depth to get how powerful a process it can be.  


There I feel better about today now, having written about it just a little bit.