Podcast: Catherine Mulligan @API_Economics of the Future Cities Catapult @futurecitiescat #IWD2016

Download (5MB)

Cathy talks to us about the importance of including and attracting more women in building the future; the importance of support from family and teachers; actively explaining what an exciting career engineering can be; she also tells us about the work of the Future Cities Catapult

Helen Keegan and I spent International Women’s Day interviewing women (and some men) in tech (and other sectors!) in London about their experience of gender in the workplace and where we’re at with equality. We’re releasing the audio as podcasts over the next couple of days with minimal editing. We will produce a digest of all the conversations later in the week.

Podcast: Imogen Wethered from @qudini (solving queuing) #IWD2016

Download (6MB)

We dashed over to Accelerator in Kingsland Rd to meet Imogen from Qudini

The product was born at a hackathon in 2012 to help solve queuing using NFC technology.

Imogen describes her move to tech from advertising, what IWD means for her as well as her approach to helping women achieve pay parity and share parenting opportunities.

Podcast: Jane van Aken from @CabApp

And now a word from our sponsors…

<a href=”https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2098876/IWD-JaneCabApp.mp3″>Download (5MB)</a>

CabApp very generously provided us with Ross Smith‘s driving services for the day.  Ross is a long-term twitter-using cabbie and took great care of us all day long.

In addition, CabApp gave us a promo code for their app – if you download it for iOS or Android and enter IWD2016 in the promo code box when registering you should find a voucher for £50 towards 15% off on longer journeys.  As Jane explains here, CabApp works across the UK and Ireland so do download it and give it a go.

Jane explains how the app works as well as some of the benefits of only working with licensed taxi drivers.

Thank you CabApp!

Helen Keegan and I spent International Women’s Day interviewing women (and some men) in tech (and other sectors!) in London about their experience of gender in the workplace and where we’re at with equality. We’re releasing the audio as podcasts over the next couple of days with minimal editing. We will produce a digest of all the conversations later in the week.


Podcast: Julia Salasky of @CrowdJusticeUK #IWD2016

Download (4.6MB)

Julia founded CrowdJustice as a crowdfunding platform for communities to raise funds for legal disputes.

She talks here about the differences she’s noticed, moving from the legal world to the tech industry, especially the differences in mindset regarding risk and innovation and expresses her hope for tech that can enable social change.

Helen Keegan and I spent International Women’s Day interviewing women (and some men) in tech (and other sectors!) in London about their experience of gender in the workplace and where we’re at with equality. We’re releasing the audio as podcasts over the next couple of days with minimal editing. We will produce a digest of all the conversations later in the week.

#IWD2016 Roundtable with @technokitten @katielips @the_anke @anjali28 @hampstead17

Download (21MB)

Helen Keegan and I spent International Women’s Day interviewing women (and some men) in tech (and other sectors!) in London about their experience of gender in the workplace and where we’re at with equality. We’re releasing the audio as podcasts over the next couple of days with minimal editing. We will produce a digest of all the conversations later in the week.

We started the day with a group in the boardroom at Z/Yen (thanks to Linda for opening up for us!)

You’ll hear about:

Income parity; Unconscious biases; Using “feminine” skills and attributes; Alternative ways of working and earning a living; Attitudes in younger generations; The importance of gender-neutral parenting; Government’s attitude to work and women; International examples of progress; Some individual thoughts on pledges for parity and what we’re going to do in future.

Women’s work #IWD2016

I don’t work for free, that’s a firm rule.  But when Helen asked me to help with making a series of podcasts with women in tech for International Women’s Day, I said yes without hesitation.

I’m proud of the work we did today, all of us, in collaboration.  I know that you’ll get great value out of listening to the stories of the women we met and worked with.

But whatever the financial value, whatever I might have been paid ordinarily for a day like today can only represent a tiny, tiny fraction of the value of unpaid physical and emotional labour as well as financial support given to me by the women whose homes and lives I’ve shared over the years, support which continues to today.

Thank you, all of you, mother and sister, grandmothers and aunts, girlfriends and wives, I love you all.

What are we selling? #tuttleconsult

In the day or so since I posted about the “airbnb for brains” I’ve had lots of interesting reactions.  A couple have been like the comment Patrick posted there which boils down to: “my initial reaction was yeah, there’s something in that, but I don’t want to be part of something exploitative” – and this reflects the experience and perception that the collaborative economy is about companies that making big profits at the expense of workers’ wages and driving down working conditions.

OK, I’ll say it clearly.  I’m really not interested in making or being something like that either.  I don’t believe that it’s a natural consequence of organising like this (and we don’t know quite how we’re organising yet!) and if it turns out that in order to make it succeed then people will be working for less than they get now and under worse working conditions then we’ll stop.  I will pull the plug.

So what am I thinking about doing?  How do you bootstrap a platform like this?  Forgive me for making it simple to the brink of simplistic:

we start by working together to make and sell some knowledge products and then we make and sell some more.

This post is another piece in the puzzle.  It’s not that I have the whole picture laid out in detail and I’m giving you one piece at a time because I’m mean, the picture is formed by sharing what’s in the front of my head right now and you reacting.  Please do react in the open and point at the holes you see as well as the excitement you feel.

I’ll explain a bit about what I mean by knowledge products.  In the mid-nineties, I was working at the Audit Commission.  Specifically, I was working in the Local Government Studies Directorate (LGS).  Our overall job was to ensure the economy, efficiency and effectiveness of local public services and our products were known as “value for money studies”  Every year we would consult with our customers (local councils) and other stakeholders (government departments, other quangos, NGOs) on what policy or service areas we should study.  Small teams would then be formed to spend 12-18 months looking at one of these areas in great depth through talking to stakeholders and service providers, doing fieldwork, collecting data and analysing it.  In general, there’d be a policy specialist in charge who would write the National Report (a kind of state of the nation assessment of the service) and an auditor who would create a value for money audit product (a set of diagnostic and benchmarking tools perhaps) for District Auditors to use as part of their value for money work with councils.  If you listened to the Today programme on Radio4 at all during the nineties, you may remember the periodic publication of these studies often with a headline like “The Audit Commission has today expressed concern at the state of services in England and Wales for some of the most vulnerable people, blah blah blah…”  We would then run some training for auditors in how to assess the services against the national picture and they would go out and sell it to their customers.

Did you spot the products in there?  There’s

  • the study itself – events perhaps involving an advisory board and fieldwork, none of which was only one-way, the councils and others contributing to studies learned stuff as they went along too;
  • the big report findings of the study, written in a standard, pithy style, with lots of data tables and charts;
  • the audit product, a set of checklists, processes, benchmarking or context-making data that help auditors to deliver value on the ground to end-clients; and
  • the training for auditors in how use this product.

So how does that help us now?  How do we transfer this into our domain of interest and update it for the 21st Century?

Say, for example, we started with a focus on the Future of Work.  Helen and I have run some successful Open Spaces on various aspects of the subject so we know it’s a topic that’s rich and interesting to people.

What if we got a bunch of people together to write the Tuttle view of the Future of Work as at March/April 2016?  We’d work out how best to organise it and hold the principle that everyone gets paid for their contribution (which would include me and Helen for our initial work in the Open Spaces) and then write something, as quickly and as dirtily as we were happy with (there might be a bit more research to do) and then package it for sale as an e-book/print on demand/transmedia experience.

At the same time, a group would look at creating a consulting product that we can license members of the network to use.  We also offer engagement in the style of the original Tuttle Consulting with a focus on Future of Work type problems.

We run (un)conferences that present some of the work and encourage more conversations (which might lead to further written or consulting products).  Some sessions might be training people to use a diagnostic tool or some other way of using the work inside organisations.

All of these are paid for and all contributors get paid a proportion, but are also responsible for sales and marketing there are no Central Services creating an overhead that has to be met regardless.  The key to building it up is that each product is also a marketing channel for other engagements, so people might come to a conference and realise we could do some consulting or get some standard consulting and realise we could do some bespoke research for them etc.

I’m going to keep developing this idea in the open as much as possible, if you want to talk about it 1:1, we can skype and record a podcast, or come to Tuttle and we’ll record it there – everyone should be able to add their thinking and see how others are doing so too.

Maybe we won’t be able to find people who’ll pay for this, or who’ll pay enough.  Maybe we won’t be able to find enough people to work with us.  Then we’ll decide, together, to stop.  But I’d like to have a go.


The Airbnb of Brains #tuttle

Consulting around technological change is a very large market indeed, dominated by accounting and strategy consulting firms – if you were going to build a firm from scratch to compete with the big four/five/six professional service firms, you’d need to spend a lot of money over a long period of time, wouldn’t you?

When Tuttle started, eight years ago, I called it a prototype but I wasn’t quite sure that I knew what it was a prototype for.  At the time it felt like we were making a new kind of space for work, and that looked like the emerging co-working model, of which, at the time, there were no real examples here in the UK.  So yeah, we were probably going to be a co-working space.  But then we carried on meeting and it turned out that even when there were co-working spaces, there was still something to be done, there was still much life in the marketplace for people and ideas that is two hours between 10 and midday every Friday, somewhere in London.

We created together a consulting offer, which we took out with some success, but most of the economic, commercial and energetic work happened in small autonomous groups, peer-to-peer.

I’ve been thinking again recently about how we can open up aggregated knowledge and skills, sliced in interesting ways to help businesses and large organisations deal with technological change.

Silicon Valley may be bubbling right now, but it’s unlikely to ever stop lobbing over these little bombs of change and disruption in the form of new hardware and software and ideas for organising the world more effectively.  When I’ve spoken to people recently about VR, Blockchain, IoT and Artificial Intelligence, they’ve expressed weariness in the face of yet another wave of tech.  Most people my age say “We lived through the introduction of PCs to the workplace, then we had to deal with e-mail and the web and now you’re saying it’s all going to be turned upside down again?”  Well yes and the biggest mistake we can make is to think this is the last round.

Silicon Valley is an engine for ongoing disruption and if we can accept that, stop fighting it and instead accept that we need people who can map out what’s really going on;  distinguish between hype and those things that look crazy but are true;  and help you make good decisions about what to do next.

Tuttle can do this.  We have many people in our near and extended network who have immersed themselves in watching how technological change happens and coming up with new processes for dealing with it.

I’ve been thinking about how to unlock the capacity that we have in the network.  And so I’ve been looking at co-operative business models, blockchain-based methods for recompensing creative work, internal currencies etc.

And then on Tuesday night I met Robin Chase and finally looked properly at the ideas in her book Peers Inc.  There, in the introduction, was a sentence that echoed what I was thinking and helped me make sense of our network in a different way.

Screen Shot 2016-03-04 at 17.06.15

We are definitely a group of diverse peers – one of the sticking points for many people hearing about us for the first time is “If these people don’t all have something specific in common, then what do they talk about, and how can it be of any value?”

We have a platform for participation – it’s every Friday morning at 10am for a couple of hours, it’s a marketplace where ideas and opportunities are traded.  It’s a very very limited form, compared to what it could be but because we’ve practiced it for many years now, some of us understand it very well.  I’m starting to think about what a web platform for this might look like.

And we have excess capacity, as I wrote yesterday – lots of people with underused or misused brains.

What if we could leverage these things together in the service of large organisations?

Which is why I just tweeted:

That’s what we’re going to make next.

Join me, comment, argue, nod vigorously, come and help, whatever works for you – but if you need help with thinking about how you can ride the waves of technological change  instead of being swamped by them, my friends and I are the ones you should be talking to.



We get all sorts at Tuttle, but over the years there’s been a consistent pattern within the whirl of on the one hand, freelancers, artists, startup founders, pet geeks and others all of whom hustle their way from gig to gig and on the other hand people with jobs who manage to escape the desk-shackles for a couple of hours of thinking differently.  In between are the people who are “resting”, between jobs, on gardening leave, or have had a few bits of freelance or interim work.

Most of these people have been in full-time employment in large organisations for many years.  They’re not lacking in skills (except perhaps hustling) but they’re loath to jump straight back into another corporate role (they’re likely in their late-forties or early-fifties) to take them through to retirement.   They also haven’t made enough money to live on that long even though they’ve enough from a redundancy package or savings or a small inheritance to keep them going for now.  They’d like to work and they’d like to have an income but none of the things on offer look tasty enough and the thought of starting a new business from scratch is too much.

The question is, how can a network like Tuttle help people like this (more accurately, how does the network help itself)?  We do it week by week in informal ways, lots of opportunities arise, good conversations and connections are made, projects get kicked off and people disappear to do them, but it feels like time again to have a go at something a little more formal, enough structure to make something happen (and hopefully not much more) – come and talk about this tomorrow and any Friday, but also let’s talk openly (here in the comments or on your own blog) about how to organize for making the most of this excess capacity because I have a feeling we’re only going to have more of it.

Chat about #Tuttle, Unconferences, Open Space with @zosiaap

Download (34MB)

I spoke this morning with Zosia Poulter who’s studying for an MA in Creative & Cultural Entrepreneurship at Goldsmiths (thanks to lovely Sian Prime for the intro). She was interested in hearing more about my approach to gathering people together to talk and do stuff.  I said yes, on the condition that I could record the conversation and publish it.

You might find it interesting if you’ve only had a little experience of self-organising conferences/events or you’ve heard of them but haven’t been able to get to one. I found it interesting to have a forum to join some of the dots for myself.

Some things that I mentioned that might be useful further reading:

Open Space Technology
The First BarCamp
An Early Sign-Up Page for Tuttle
Current Tuttle Facebook Group